Surfshark vs ProtonVPN: Which should you choose?
Comparing the official category ratings
A direct look at the 0 to 10 evaluations across our six core testing methodologies.
Breaking down the 0 to 10 scorecard across six critical testing pillars
Our team rated both services across six distinct operational categories to see where each engineering team focused their development budget. Surfshark absolutely dominates the value category with a 9.7 rating, outclassing ProtonVPN and its 8.2 score. However, if your primary concern is an absolute privacy fortress, ProtonVPN holds a slight edge at 9.5 compared to 9.3, backed by its strict alpine legal framework.
Security remains incredibly tight on both sides of the aisle. Surfshark edges ahead slightly in overall utility because it packages extra malware tools directly into the application, whereas ProtonVPN focuses purely on hardcore encryption paths like its proprietary architecture.
Speedtest infrastructure performance
We measured network throughput over 7 days using local and remote nodes on a 1 Gbps line.
Surfshark outpaces the competition on our 1 Gbps testing line
To keep things entirely fair, we tested speed using a 1 Gbps fiber baseline over a minimum of 7 days, checking performance at different times of day. We connected via the WireGuard protocol from our European workspace and initiated multiple downloads on Speedtest.net. Surfshark proved unexpectedly fast, peaking at 921 Mbps on local nodes and retaining an impressive 733 Mbps on remote paths.
In practice this means a 4K video starts playing instantly with zero buffering wheel, even if someone else in the house is downloading large game files. ProtonVPN put up a great fight with a local average of 893 Mbps, but it clearly surrenders the speed crown in this matchup, especially when routing data over long-distance remote links.
Jurisdictional law and server audits
Examining the underlying data protection laws, open-source compliance, and corporate structures.
Corporate infrastructure meets independent open-source audits
This is where the structural philosophy diverges significantly. ProtonVPN operates from its Geneva, Switzerland headquarters, completely outside the jurisdiction of 5, 9, or 14 Eyes surveillance alliances. Switzerland HQ means the local government cannot force data sharing without a complex federal court order. Furthermore, ProtonVPN relies on a completely open-source application stack and has cleared 6 independent audits, with recent evaluations completed by Securitum 2025.
On the flip side, Surfshark runs from the Netherlands, which sits inside the 9 and 14 Eyes networks. To counter this, they utilize a fully audited RAM-only server fleet, meaning all data is instantly wiped upon any power loss. What clicked for us was that Surfshark has already implemented post-quantum encryption measures in 2026, protecting your traffic against future decryption threats.
Data leak protection mechanisms
Testing automated network kill switches against sudden connection drops and server handoffs.
Bulletproof kill switches prevent accidental data leaks during drops
We forced dozens of intentional connection drops during our 90 days of daily use to see if either client would leak our real IP address. Both applications passed with flying colors. The kill switch inside ProtonVPN reacts instantly, freezing all network traffic the millisecond the handshake fails. Surfshark offers a similarly robust toggle that ensures your location remains hidden from trackers even during sudden Wi-Fi handoffs.
Ad blockers, antivirus, and specialty servers
A review of supplementary tools including malware scanners, custom protocols, and identity protection layers.
Advanced tooling gives one application a distinct suite advantage
When comparing advanced utilities, the feature spread showcases different design directions. ProtonVPN provides Secure Core servers, which route your traffic through intermediate high-security bunkers before hitting the exit node. It also features NetShield for network-level ad blocking. Disappointing was the total lack of dedicated IP options or built-in smart DNS options for old television hardware.
Meanwhile, Surfshark packs an absolute treasure trove of extras. You get MultiHop cascading routes, CleanWeb ad filtering, and access to a real antivirus scanner. It also includes a dark web monitor called Alert to scan for compromised credentials. The interface can feel slightly cluttered for beginners due to these dozens of toggles, but power users will love the sheer volume of control.
Split tunneling and port configuration
Analyzing how each client splits application traffic and manages port data for peer-to-peer sharing.
Customizable split tunneling for advanced traffic management
Both services allow you to exempt specific programs from the encrypted tunnel. We tested this heavily by routing our heavy torrent traffic through the VPN while allowing local streaming apps to run on our standard ISP line. ProtonVPN excels here by offering native port forwarding support, a feature that peer-to-peer enthusiasts heavily rely on to boost download speeds. Surfshark provides reliable application-level split tunneling but leaves out port forwarding entirely.
Payment Methods
A breakdown of anonymous checkout methods, digital currencies, and refund processing terms.
Anonymous crypto payment
If you want to buy your subscription without revealing your identity, ProtonVPN provides superior options by accepting Bitcoin alongside traditional bank transfers and raw cash sent directly to their office. Surfshark supports a wider variety of digital tokens including Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, and Dogecoin via regular crypto payment processors, but they do not accommodate physical cash payments.
Unblocking global entertainment libraries
Evaluating access to global platforms like Netflix alongside regional streaming networks.
ProtonVPN vs Surfshark for streaming: which works better?
During our streaming evaluations from our regional workspace, we checked how well each service bypassed geo-blocks on major global platforms like Netflix, Disney+, and Max. Surfshark was flawless, easily unblocking region-locked content alongside major regional platforms like Hulu, Peacock, and BBC iPlayer. Its high throughput ensured that we ran multiple 4K streams simultaneously with zero stuttering.
ProtonVPN is also a highly competent streaming provider, successfully opening multiple Netflix libraries during our evaluation. However, because it lacks a built-in smart DNS utility, configuring it on older Smart TVs or gaming consoles that don’t natively support VPN software requires a complex router-level installation.
Device limits and software compatibility
A look at software availability, user interface complexity, and simultaneous hardware caps.
Unlimited simultaneous connections redefine household protection
This is where the user experience drastically diverges. Surfshark allows you to connect an infinite number of simultaneous devices under a single subscription. We loaded it onto phones, tablets, laptops, and streaming boxes around the office without hitting a single wall. ProtonVPN caps your account at 10 simultaneous devices, which feels restrictive if you are trying to protect an entire family ecosystem.
Live assistance and ticketing response times
Comparing real-world response times between interactive live chat and standard email queues.
Real-time troubleshooting vs traditional email queues
We expected more from a premium provider, but ProtonVPN still does not offer a direct 24/7 live chat option for unauthenticated guests, forcing you to rely on their email ticketing system. While their support agents are incredibly knowledgeable, waiting hours for a reply can be frustrating. Surfshark solves this seamlessly with a responsive 24/7 live chat team that answered our configuration questions within two minutes flat.
Comparing introductory rates and renewal fees
Analyzing long-term plan configurations, monthly costs, and upcoming renewal price adjustments.
Navigating the long-term commitment and renewal price jumps
The financial side requires looking past the initial introductory discount. ProtonVPN sits at $3.59/mo for its 2-year tier, a $1.81 gap above Surfshark, which charges an aggressive $1.78/mo. Over 24 months that price difference compounds significantly, making Surfshark a much lighter lift for your wallet upfront.
Be aware of the standard renewal trap that catches most consumers off guard. Once your initial 24-month promotional billing period concludes, ProtonVPN jumps to a renewal rate of $6.66/mo, while Surfshark transitions to $6.58/mo. Thankfully, both companies include a standard 30-day money-back guarantee, which serves as a risk-free escape hatch if you change your mind during the first month.
Granular feature-by-feature breakdown
A complete technical ledger outlining every single system feature, server metric, and audited claim.
| Overall | ||
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Founded | 2014 | 2018 |
| Parent company | Proton AG | Nord Security |
| Speed & Infrastructure | ||
| Local speed | 893 Mbps | 921 Mbps |
| Remote speed (US←EU) | 715 Mbps | 733 Mbps |
| Latency (local) | 13 ms | 14 ms |
| Protocols | WireGuard, OpenVPN, Stealth | WireGuard, OpenVPN, IKEv2 |
| Servers | 20,050+ | 4,500+ |
| Countries | 145+ | 100 |
| RAM-only servers | No | Yes |
| P2P / torrenting servers | Yes | Yes |
| Supports 4K streaming | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing & Plans | ||
| 2-year plan | $3.59/mo | $1.78/mo |
| 1-year plan | $3.99/mo | $2.99/mo |
| Monthly plan | $9.99/mo | $15.45/mo |
| Free version | Yes | No |
| Free trial | N/A | 7 days |
| Money-back guarantee | 30 days | 30 days |
| Anonymous payment (crypto) | BTC | BTC, ETH, LTC+ |
| Simultaneous devices | 10 | Unlimited |
| Security & Encryption | ||
| Encryption | AES-256, ChaCha20 | AES-256-GCM, ChaCha20 |
| Post-quantum encryption | No | Yessince 2026 |
| Kill switch | Yes | Yes |
| DNS leak protection | Yes | Yes |
| IPv6 leak protection | Yes | Yes |
| WebRTC leak protection | Yes | Yes |
| Perfect Forward Secrecy | Yes | Yes |
| Split tunneling | Yes | Yes |
| Double VPN (MultiHop) | Secure Core | MultiHop |
| Obfuscation (China/UAE) | Stealth | NoBorders |
| Tor over VPN | Yes | No |
| SOCKS5 proxy | No | No |
| Meshnet (P2P LAN) | No | No |
| Dedicated IP | No | Yes |
| Smart DNS | No | Yes |
| Ad / malware blocker | NetShield | CleanWeb |
| Port forwarding | Yes | No |
| Privacy & Jurisdiction | ||
| Independent audits | 6× | 4× |
| Audited by | Securitum 2025, Securitum 2024, Securitum 2023 | Deloitte, SecuRing |
| Transparency report | Yes | Yes |
| Open source app | Yes | No |
| Bug bounty program | Yes | Yes |
| Jurisdiction | Switzerland | Netherlands |
| Streaming & Use cases | ||
| Works in China | Yes | No |
| Works in Russia | Yes | No |
| Works in UAE | Yes | Yes |
| Torrenting allowed | Yes | Yes |
| Gaming support | Yes | Yes |
| Platforms & Devices | ||
| Windows / macOS / Linux | Yes | Yes |
| iOS / Android | Yes | Yes |
| Router | Yes | Yes |
| Trust & Ratings | ||
| Trustpilot score | 2.1 / 5 (882) | 4.3 / 5 (29,204) |
| App Store rating | 4.6 ★ | 4.7 ★ |
| Google Play rating | 4.7 ★ | 4.6 ★ |
| Support | ||
| 24/7 live chat (response) | N/A | ≤10 min |
| Email support (response) | ≤24 h | ≤24 h |
| Documentation quality | 9.7 / 10 | 8.8 / 10 |
| Try | Try | |
The granular feature comparison from server counts to leak tests
Evaluating the complete specification sheets reveals major infrastructure differences. ProtonVPN commands a massive network of 20,050+ servers across 145+ countries, giving it a much broader geographical footprint. In comparison, Surfshark manages a smaller but highly optimized pool of 4,500+ servers in 100 countries. An entirely open-source codebase lets external teams review every line on one side, while RAM-only hardware protects the other.
Answering your core comparison questions
Clear answers to the most common questions regarding these two major providers.
Choosing your ideal network companion
Our team’s final definitive recommendations based on 90 days of comparative testing.

