IPVanish vs ProtonVPN: which network takes the crown?
How our team scored IPVanish and ProtonVPN
Our team rated both providers across six fundamental vectors on a 0 to 10 scale. These scores reflect active testing data rather than marketing specs.
The hard data behind our performance ratings
The raw scorecard hides a lot. The narrow gap between IPVanish’s 8.9 overall score and ProtonVPN’s 8.8 masks how differently these services behave in practice. IPVanish dominates the speed category with 9.3, courtesy of excellent local routing, and posts a 8.9 value score on the back of its unlimited-device policy: serious leverage for families or multi-device households.
ProtonVPN answers with an elite 9.5 privacy rating and a 9.2 security mark, both anchored to a strict audit framework and fully independent apps. It drops noticeably in the value column at 8.2, dragged down by steeper short-term pricing. Read the numbers carefully and a clear picture emerges: these two providers are chasing different subscribers.
Is IPVanish faster than ProtonVPN on real lines?
We measured performance from multiple international locations using Speedtest.net on a standard 1 Gbps fiber baseline during our 80-day evaluation window.
IPVanish owns the long-haul lanes, ProtonVPN edges ahead on local hops
Our methodology runs on a clean 1 Gbps line using WireGuard, with samples pulled at multiple times of day across the 80-day window to flatten out congestion spikes. From our main London office, IPVanish turned in an unexpectedly punchy result: 837 Mbps with 12 ms latency. In practice, 4K streams kick in instantly and the interface never stutters.
Swap over to ProtonVPN on the same local node and we logged 893 Mbps, nosing just ahead of its rival on the short hop. The story shifts when we route across the Atlantic to New York. On the long haul, IPVanish held 779 Mbps while ProtonVPN dipped to 715 Mbps. IPVanish carries the more consistent network plumbing over distance, ProtonVPN grabs the local-speed crown.
Swiss open-source vs court-tested US logging policies
An in-depth look at corporate transparency, independent security audits, encryption algorithms, and international legal protections.
Jurisdiction deep-dive and logging transparency
The legal home of your provider dictates how it must handle external data requests. IPVanish is based in the United States, a founding member of the 5 Eyes alliance, which for some buyers reads as an instant deal-breaker. Track record matters more than postcode, though. IPVanish has put its infrastructure through 2 independent audits, the most recent by Leviathan Security Group in 2025, confirming no user logs are held on its RAM-only servers.
ProtonVPN fights from a different posture entirely. Geneva headquarters, fully outside US and EU surveillance pacts, every app 100% open source, and 6 public audits primarily conducted by Securitum. If an agency demands data from Proton AG, Swiss federal law blocks automatic disclosure. Both sides ship AES-256 and ChaCha20, but ProtonVPN wins the trust battle by letting anyone verify the code line by line.
Testing kill switch reliability under sudden disconnects
A direct analysis of how effectively each client stops data leaks when a network connection fails unexpectedly.
How reliable are the built-in kill switches?
A kill switch is your last line of defence when an internet connection drops without warning. Across the 80-day evaluation, we forced manual network disconnects to clock how fast each client cut traffic. Neither leaked a single packet.
IPVanish ships a clean, native implementation across its desktop clients, holding your IP under wraps during Wi-Fi handoffs. ProtonVPN goes one step further with a permanent kill switch that blocks all internet access even when you deliberately disconnect from the VPN, so you can’t accidentally browse in the clear. On public Wi-Fi, that’s the safer default by some margin.
Specialized privacy tools and network extras
Comparing proprietary features like multi-hop routing, malware blocking, and specialized proxy configurations for advanced users.
Specialty tools: Secure Core architecture vs SOCKS5 proxies
The extras tell two very different stories. ProtonVPN ships its signature Secure Core architecture, routing traffic through high-security servers in Switzerland or Iceland before passing it to a secondary exit node. NetShield, its in-app ad and malware blocker, strips the worst of modern web junk cleanly.
The trade-off: all those advanced toggles can feel cluttered to a newcomer. IPVanish skips multi-hop entirely but bakes in a native SOCKS5 proxy, a serious win for torrent clients where you want a masked endpoint without the encryption overhead. Threat Protection handles basic trackers, but it doesn’t pretend to match the depth of the Swiss toolkit.
Managing application traffic with split tunneling
An evaluation of how flexibly each provider allows you to split your internet traffic between the encrypted tunnel and local networks.
Split tunneling support across different operating systems
Split tunneling lets you pick which apps run through the encrypted tunnel and which hit the internet directly. We exercised it for weeks from our office, pushing heavy streaming platforms through the VPN while keeping local banking apps on the standard ISP line. Both providers cope, but platform coverage is uneven.
IPVanish runs reliable split tunneling on Android and Windows; macOS, as with most rivals, is the weak link. ProtonVPN layers in advanced app-based and IP-based routing on Windows and Android, granular enough to peel a specific smart-home device off the tunnel without breaking the rest of your setup.
Anonymous billing and accepted payment options
Reviewing the available purchase methods for both services, focusing on crypto support and anonymous signup alternatives.
Anonymity at checkout and payment methods
Real privacy starts before you ever connect to a server. It starts at checkout. IPVanish keeps it conventional: major credit cards, PayPal, Google Pay. There is no anonymous payment option at all, which will give pause to anyone who would rather keep their name off the paper trail. ProtonVPN pulls clear daylight here.
The Swiss company accepts traditional cards and the usual electronic rails, but it also takes Bitcoin and, remarkably, physical cash mailed to its Geneva headquarters. Pair that with an anonymous email and the sign-up trail goes effectively cold, which is something almost no mainstream provider can claim.
Streaming Platform Support
Unblocking global and local streaming libraries
For plenty of subscribers, unblocking media libraries is the whole point of running a VPN. We pitted both against the global heavyweights, Netflix and Disney+, plus regional US and UK catalogues. IPVanish cleared US platforms with room to spare: Hulu, Peacock and Max all loaded in 4K without a hiccup, and the high local speeds kept the quality bar pinned for the entire test.
ProtonVPN leans on its specialised Plus servers to walk past geo-blocks, opening BBC iPlayer and Paramount+ without tripping proxy detection. Its Stealth protocol surprised us by punching through strict restrictive networks where lesser obfuscation usually fails. Both are capable streaming companions, but the raw speed advantage of IPVanish edges it ahead for marathon sessions.
Interface usability and simultaneous connection limits
We look at user interface complexity across desktop and mobile, alongside account limitations on concurrent device usage.
App design, layout, and device connection limits
How you live with these services day-to-day comes down to their app layout. IPVanish builds its interface around a real-time data map: striking, slightly intimidating, and arguably too much screen real estate for a casual user. What it gets right is the connection ceiling, namely that there isn’t one. Unlimited simultaneous devices means every phone, tablet, laptop and streaming stick in the house runs off a single subscription.
The ProtonVPN app, by contrast, feels polished but dense, with dozens of toggles and country lists fronting you from the off. Your account is capped at 10 devices. That’s enough for one person with a typical kit, but it can’t touch the freedom of an unlimited policy once you scale to a household running multiple operating systems.
Live chat availability and technical support comparison
Testing the responsiveness and availability of human customer support agents via live channels and email ticket systems.
Customer service response times and help channels
When an exit node misbehaves or a streaming session breaks, you want help, not a queue. IPVanish delivers cleanly here, fielding a genuine 24/7 live chat alongside email ticketing and a deep knowledge base. We pinged the chat across different time zones and consistently reached a human agent inside two minutes, which is ideal for sorting quick configuration headaches.
ProtonVPN is the weaker hand on immediate assistance. There is no 24/7 live chat for standard enquiries, which routes you to email tickets or the community forum. Email replies are technical, thorough and accurate, but waiting several hours for a server recommendation can grate.
Long-term subscription value and initial sign-up rates
Breaking down 2-year promotional tiers, subsequent renewal pricing increases, and available risk-free trial windows.
Navigating the long-term plans and renewal price jumps
Promo rates never last forever, so the long-term cost is the number worth fixing in your head before you sign. ProtonVPN commands $3.59/mo on the 2-year tier, opening a noticeable $1.40 gap above IPVanish at $2.19/mo. Over 24 months, that delta is material; the upfront ticket on IPVanish simply costs you less.
Both sides hide a renewal trap, though. Once the initial 24 months elapse, IPVanish jumps to $7.50/mo and ProtonVPN moves to $6.66/mo. Each carries a sturdy 30-day money-back guarantee as a safety net, and IPVanish sweetens the offer with a 7-day mobile free trial so you can pressure-test the network before any money changes hands.
The complete side-by-side technical specification chart
A comprehensive data grid covering more than 60 specific features, server statistics, and technical capabilities for both networks.
| Overall | ||
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Founded | 2012 | 2014 |
| Parent company | Ziff Davis | Proton AG |
| Speed & Infrastructure | ||
| Local speed | 837 Mbps | 893 Mbps |
| Remote speed (US←EU) | 779 Mbps | 715 Mbps |
| Latency (local) | 12 ms | 13 ms |
| Protocols | WireGuard, OpenVPN, IKEv2, L2TP/IPSec | WireGuard, OpenVPN, Stealth |
| Servers | 3,200+ | 20,050+ |
| Countries | 91+ | 145+ |
| RAM-only servers | Yes | No |
| P2P / torrenting servers | Yes | Yes |
| Supports 4K streaming | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing & Plans | ||
| 2-year plan | $2.19/mo | $3.59/mo |
| 1-year plan | $3.33/mo | $3.99/mo |
| Monthly plan | $12.99/mo | $9.99/mo |
| Free version | No | Yes |
| Free trial | 7 days | N/A |
| Money-back guarantee | 30 days | 30 days |
| Anonymous payment (crypto) | N/A | BTC |
| Simultaneous devices | Unlimited | 10 |
| Security & Encryption | ||
| Encryption | AES-256-GCM, ChaCha20-Poly1305 | AES-256, ChaCha20 |
| Kill switch | Yes | Yes |
| DNS leak protection | Yes | Yes |
| IPv6 leak protection | Yes | Yes |
| WebRTC leak protection | No | Yes |
| Perfect Forward Secrecy | Yes | Yes |
| Split tunneling | Yes | Yes |
| Double VPN (MultiHop) | N/A | Secure Core |
| Obfuscation (China/UAE) | Scramble | Stealth |
| Tor over VPN | No | Yes |
| SOCKS5 proxy | Yes | No |
| Meshnet (P2P LAN) | No | No |
| Dedicated IP | No | No |
| Smart DNS | No | No |
| Ad / malware blocker | Threat Protection | NetShield |
| Port forwarding | No | Yes |
| Privacy & Jurisdiction | ||
| Independent audits | 2× | 6× |
| Audited by | Leviathan Security Group, Schellman Compliance LLC | Securitum 2025, Securitum 2024, Securitum 2023 |
| Transparency report | Yes | Yes |
| Open source app | No | Yes |
| Bug bounty program | No | Yes |
| Jurisdiction | USA | Switzerland |
| Streaming & Use cases | ||
| Works in China | No | Yes |
| Works in Russia | Yes | Yes |
| Works in UAE | Yes | Yes |
| Torrenting allowed | Yes | Yes |
| Gaming support | Yes | Yes |
| Platforms & Devices | ||
| Windows / macOS / Linux | Yes | Yes |
| iOS / Android | Yes | Yes |
| Router | Yes | Yes |
| Trust & Ratings | ||
| Trustpilot score | 4.6 / 5 (10,137) | 2.1 / 5 (882) |
| App Store rating | 4.6 ★ | 4.6 ★ |
| Google Play rating | 4.4 ★ | 4.7 ★ |
| Support | ||
| 24/7 live chat (response) | ≤3 min | N/A |
| Email support (response) | ≤48 h | ≤24 h |
| Documentation quality | 8.7 / 10 | 9.7 / 10 |
| Try | Try | |
Analyzing the complete technical specifications
Look past the marketing posters and the underlying infrastructure tells you what each network is actually capable of. ProtonVPN runs a massive fleet of 20,050+ servers across 145+ countries. In practice, that global spread means a nearby exit node is almost always within reach, even in niche regions, which keeps latency in check.
IPVanish manages a smaller estate of 3,200+ servers across 91+ countries. The reach is narrower, but the key wrinkle is that IPVanish owns a meaningful slice of its core infrastructure rather than renting virtual space. That layout goes a long way to explaining why local-network speeds stay so reliably high despite the smaller geographic footprint.
Frequently asked questions about IPVanish and ProtonVPN
The questions readers asked most often during our 80-day IPVanish vs ProtonVPN evaluation
Our final editorial recommendation
A concise summary of our findings after 80 days of side-by-side testing, helping you choose the right provider for your specific online habits.

